I dislike family politics
Jul. 26th, 2004 06:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The man is a known child molester.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Old New England family. He is the family patriarch. The whole family knows that he likes little girls, and most of them carefully pretend that the problem doesn't exist.
Old family, old blood, and he has the family estate. According to his eldest daughter (
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
If you do anything that upsets her, you get cut out of any will that she has any control over, and she does his books and estate for him. And not letting him have access to his kids, grandkids, and great-grandkids upsets her. And she still believes that he has a right to see his great-grandchildren, even after one of her sisters sent a letter to every family member that she had an address for. Said letter was a copy of one that she had sent her father, and listed what he had done to her and to her older daughter.
Our daughters,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I despise family politics.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-26 05:13 pm (UTC)my entry is friends locked. if you go to my journal you will not see the post or responses unless you are on my friends list.
Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 05:15 pm (UTC)Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 06:13 pm (UTC)our family doesn't consider the money aspect worth anything. the rest of warin's relitives do. they pressure him to visit and to bring the girls to visit. he occasionally visits to shut up his mom. the last visit was 4 years ago and started a huge argument because we left the girls with my folks and adamently refused to allow that man to see them.
warin tries to keep some sebalance of peace with his relitives, but his mom has already cut him and all his siblings and all his kids out of her will. because we are poly and won't teach the kids to lie about it. (she claims she cut his siblings from the will because she couldn't be sure they would follow her moral values either.)
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 06:16 pm (UTC)I am HORRIFIED that the will is an inducement to permit visitations among Warin's relatives. (I mean, it's gross, but ain't that pimping?)
This is Warin's mother's father, right? I find it curious that she's all down with this, unless she does not believe that the abuse has actually happened.
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 06:43 pm (UTC)Oh, she believes that it happened to her and her sisters, not that she calls it abuse. She calls it 'preparing them to be wives'. She also refuse to hear any evidence that he has ever done it to anyone else. She flat out states that he hasn't done it to anyone else at all, full stop, end of story.
She has yet to be budged so much as an inch from this stance.
And, with Kathy, money and appearances are the be-all, end-all of existence. Literally nothing else matters, including what's actually going on, as long as the family looks good and is wealthy. Including telling Catchild that she was lying when she told Kathy that she caught dear ol' Grampa with his hand up a four-year old's dress at Cathild's wedding. After all, that would have caused a fuss at the wedding.
Yeah, this is Warin's mother's father. The woman is poison. She learned it at her father's knee, I guess.
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 07:04 pm (UTC)(I discovered a long time ago that the best response to truly poisonous people is to be consistently nice, and firm with my boundaries, and uninterested in their drama, no matter what....it drives them batty, and gives my sadistic little heart a thrill -- and eventually they stop trying to get your goat because they're not getting anywhere)
In any case, ya'll know I'm here, I care, and I'm rooting for all of you.
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-26 08:08 pm (UTC)However. I do actually love and appreciate Grampa. I think he's too fond of patting girls on the bottom as they go by, and I've felt uncomfortable about it a couple of times, but after I established with him that I didn't like to be touched that way, I stopped having a problem. I know that those who don't live in his vicinity probably don't have the chance to establish such baseline rules, and I know it sucks that they have to be established. But the man isn't just someone who abused his kids and feels so guilty about it that he can't deal with it. He's also the man who supported my right to never see my father again, even if that meant uninviting my father's family to my graduation and now the wedding so that I wouldn't have to deal with that crap. Grampa was the only one who said (and loudly) to Jim's face that my father was a con man and an asshole.
I understand your concerns, and I share them. I agree that you can't take Kathy's word that Grampa would be okay to visit with the girls. However, I also think that you would really like Pat, Grampa's new wife, and you would be impressed with how well she has trained him. Pat is absolutely incredible, and I like her a hell of a lot. :)
Nobody needs to actually DO anything here, as far as I can tell. If Grampa actually were to visit, you could send the girls away for that time. You could also just explain that you (singly or collectively) are just too ill for him to come to you, but he could visit with Scott if he wanted to meet somewhere. I honestly think that Grampa is interested in how his extended family is doing, and he considers you all part of that because you're part of Scott's life. That's how he treated Mom's live-in boyfriend, Doug, before he died a couple of years ago. Grampa has been treating Steve as family for about a year now, even before we got engaged. Grampa has mellowed from his hidebound views, and may actually (gasp) be trying to get the real scoop instead of hearing his news alternatively from Kathy and me. (Not that I pass a lot on, but I do correct him whenever he tries to figure out the situation and gets confused about how people could possibly be poly and be happy about it.)
That's my $5.00, anyway. YMMV.
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-27 08:07 am (UTC)but his molestation goes beyond a pat on the bottem as you go by. it includes things like putting his hand up the dress of a four year old girl. caressing the breasts of barley pubesent kids. pulling not yet pubesent girls into his lap and kissing them with an open mouth while running his hands over thier bottoms. and this is all things i've seen him do with my own eyes. some of it at my wedding some of it when we went up for gram's memorial service.
i can assure you if he tried any of that shite with my children he'd be dead. if he tried it with any of the adult members of sanctuary he'd be in jail on sexual assult charges. his name and money would not protect him here.
axis of evil, anyone? =(
Date: 2004-07-29 10:04 pm (UTC)And no, with Kathy money and appearances are NOT everything. She cares about education -- moved to bass-ackwards Alabama far from any family to get it for her kids, and by goddess, it worked. She cares about the environment, for its own sake. She cares about her children's happiness and well-being, though her worldview insists that we'll be truly happier as strict modern Baptists.
Neither "appearances" nor "money" have to do with the letters and phone calls we share sometimes. She didn't lead Girl Scouts for umpteen years to get into the society pages. Her stamp club and canoeing aren't part of some dark plot to preserve the family's status and influence. She's a real person. I think the worst problem between her and the rest of the world is that she tries to share her values too hard and too blindly, which may be idiotically short-sighted but isn't evil.
*shudder* It feels weird defending my grandfather and my mother to the rest of my family.
Re: axis of evil, anyone? =(
Date: 2004-07-30 12:27 pm (UTC)I know the feeling . . . My comment (at the time of this writing, the last one on the page) includes something that may not be very well phrased, but is intended to say that Grampa did a lot of things in his life, and some of them were bad, but not all of them were. The same applies to Mom.
Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-27 08:14 am (UTC)Re: Ummm
Date: 2004-07-27 08:16 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-07-27 01:23 pm (UTC)I wonder whether my mom's attitude about her dad's actions has changed at all since seeing the letter my aunt V (one of her younger sisters) sent out recently. V explained therein her stance on Grampa's actions while she was a child, and what she will permit now (as far as visitation and the like), and specifically stated that while she does not like what he did, she still still loves him. The things he did wrong were far and away from the only things he did, to her and to others.